You may be anticipating where I'm going. If there were those negative impacts after the Mulroney Conservatives increased the inclusion rate in 1988, were the Conservatives economically asleep at the switch, then, in 1990 when they increased the inclusion rate to 75%? In that two-year period, they either failed to appreciate that there were negative impacts of their increase to 66% or they were oblivious to those negative impacts, because they then increased it again to 75%.
Can you help me understand that move by them?