Thanks so much for the question.
There are really two sides to this. One has been the increasing activity of real estate investment trusts in buying up traditional purpose-built housing with the goal of maximizing profits from those assets, as opposed to maintaining tenants in those apartment buildings for long periods of time.
This is a change from the traditional ownership structure that you'd see in purpose-built housing from smaller, more local enterprises that might be focused on steady streams of income versus larger, profit-oriented publicly listed companies whose goal is to extract as much profit as possible from tenants.
On the one side, I think it's important to eliminate the tax preference for real estate investment trusts, which is one of the reasons they've gained so much prominence. The other side is to put co-ops and non-profits on an equal footing for their ability to purchase purpose-built housing and to retain it not for the profit of investors, but for a livable place for tenants to live—likely lower-income tenants—often in downtown cores.