Yes. Certainly, in terms of a land and existing assets acquisition fund, we're recommending a fund of $340 million a year. This would be partially offset by the removal of the real estate investment trust tax preference, which allows the pass-through of profits that investors can then deduct on their side, often because they're not in RRSPs. This trade, in essence, would shift the balance of power, to some degree, back towards non-profits.
I think the other thing to mention, of course, is that there has been a fair amount of recent attention on the national housing strategy and the fact that it does appear to be funding many at-market units, in essence. Its definition of “affordable” is extremely generous, and many projects that were going to go ahead on the private side are being funded in any event, and some of the structures within the NHS actually make it more difficult for non-profits and co-ops to gain access to the funds.