Evidence of meeting #20 for Finance in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was c-8.

A video is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Patrick Taillon  Professor and Associate Director of the Centre for Constitutional and Administrative Law Studies , Faculty of Law, Université Laval, As an Individual
Mark Agnew  Senior Vice-President, Policy and Government Relations, Canadian Chamber of Commerce
Yves Giroux  Parliamentary Budget Officer, Office of the Parliamentary Budget Officer
James Cohen  Executive Director, Transparency International Canada
Clerk of the Committee  Mr. Alexandre Roger

4 p.m.

Executive Director, Transparency International Canada

James Cohen

Could you repeat the question?

4 p.m.

Conservative

Philip Lawrence Conservative Northumberland—Peterborough South, ON

That's no problem, Mr. Cohen.

In Bill C-8, there are financial measures that effectively give the government the ability to freeze the bank accounts of political dissenters. Do you believe the government has been transparent in discussing who will be targeted by these measures and which accounts will be frozen, and why?

4 p.m.

Executive Director, Transparency International Canada

James Cohen

I was invited here to talk about Bill C-8. I will respond to this briefly. I heard of the use of illegal blockades, but I have still to hear what the definition of that term specifically means. I would encourage the government to use a very high standard of transparency going forward.

4 p.m.

Conservative

Philip Lawrence Conservative Northumberland—Peterborough South, ON

Thank you, Mr. Cohen. I do appreciate that.

Mr. Agnew, I'd like just a brief comment. If, in fact, your members felt like their assets could be exposed to government confiscation for political dissent, would that have a negative impact on them?

4 p.m.

Senior Vice-President, Policy and Government Relations, Canadian Chamber of Commerce

Mark Agnew

Certainly in a free and democratic society such as ours, predictability and the rule of law are absolutely critical for members. That's something I think we have heard time and time again over the last number of weeks from them on this issue.

4 p.m.

Conservative

Philip Lawrence Conservative Northumberland—Peterborough South, ON

Thank you very much.

With the lack of transparency and the potential impact on Canadians, I would like to bring a motion. I believe it has been circulated to our members by the clerk in both official languages. If you wish, I can read it.

4 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Peter Fonseca

MP Lawrence, as you know, it would be inadmissible at this time to bring that forward.

4 p.m.

Conservative

Philip Lawrence Conservative Northumberland—Peterborough South, ON

How so? This is in respect of Bill C-8, which is on the economy. You know that, arguably, financial measures that can confiscate Canadians' assets might have something to do with the economy, Mr. Chair, with respect.

4 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Peter Fonseca

It is not Bill C-8, MP Lawrence.

4 p.m.

Conservative

Philip Lawrence Conservative Northumberland—Peterborough South, ON

You do not believe the emergency measures will affect the economy.

4 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Peter Fonseca

MP Lawrence, we are here discussing Bill C-8 and that motion has nothing to do with Bill C-8.

4 p.m.

Conservative

Philip Lawrence Conservative Northumberland—Peterborough South, ON

This motion has everything to do with Bill C-8. We need to understand the economic background of why the fiscal update was put in place. This will have an impact on that, on our revenue and on our very economy.

4 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Peter Fonseca

MP Lawrence, the witnesses are here for Bill C-8. This has nothing to do with Bill C-8. Your time is up, actually.

We are moving to the Liberals. We have MP Dzerowicz up for six minutes.

4 p.m.

Conservative

Philip Lawrence Conservative Northumberland—Peterborough South, ON

On a point of order, Mr. Chair, was my time adjusted for the discussion and for the points of order?

4 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Peter Fonseca

It was, Mr. Lawrence. I checked with the clerk. Thank you.

We are moving to the Liberals, with Ms. Dzerowicz.

4 p.m.

Conservative

Greg McLean Conservative Calgary Centre, AB

On a point of order, Mr. Chair, I believe there's a motion on the floor that you are ruling out of order. I think we have to see if it actually is out of order. It is pertinent to the debate we have here.

4 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Peter Fonseca

It is out of order.

4 p.m.

Conservative

Greg McLean Conservative Calgary Centre, AB

I'm going to have to challenge the chair on that because I think it is pertinent to what we're studying here right now.

4 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Peter Fonseca

There has been a challenge to the chair.

4 p.m.

Liberal

Sophie Chatel Liberal Pontiac, QC

I have a point of order.

It may be a question. What is the challenge? Is it that we are changing the agenda now? Is that what my Conservative colleagues want, to change the agenda of our meeting? I'm very confused right now, Mr. Chair.

4 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Peter Fonseca

MP McLean, what is the point of order and what is—

4 p.m.

Conservative

Greg McLean Conservative Calgary Centre, AB

The point of order is a challenge to the chair. I'm sure you heard that, Mr. Chair.

4 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Peter Fonseca

It is a challenge to the chair on a motion that is inadmissible.

4 p.m.

Conservative

Greg McLean Conservative Calgary Centre, AB

That you ruled inadmissible....

4 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Peter Fonseca

I ruled it inadmissible.