Evidence of meeting #27 for Finance in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was rcmp.

A video is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Clerk of the Committee  Mr. Alexandre Roger
Angelina Mason  General Counsel and Vice-President, Canadian Bankers Association
Darren Hannah  Vice-President, Finance, Risk and Prudential Policy, Canadian Bankers Association
Commissioner Michel Arcand  Assistant Commissioner, Federal Policing Criminal Operations, Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Denis Beaudoin  Director, Financial Crime, Royal Canadian Mounted Police

5:05 p.m.

Conservative

Dan Albas Conservative Central Okanagan—Similkameen—Nicola, BC

All right. I'm going to pass my time on to MP Fast, please.

5:05 p.m.

Conservative

Ed Fast Conservative Abbotsford, BC

Mr. Arcand, I believe you also testified that the Emergencies Act, including the right to freeze accounts, made it easier for you to remove the protest. Is that correct? I'm trying to remember what you said.

5:05 p.m.

A/Commr Michel Arcand

Yes. It did facilitate.

5:05 p.m.

Conservative

Ed Fast Conservative Abbotsford, BC

Facilitate: Is it your testimony that it made it easier for you to—

5:05 p.m.

A/Commr Michel Arcand

Yes.

5:05 p.m.

Conservative

Ed Fast Conservative Abbotsford, BC

Okay.

Do you believe it's the function of policing authorities to have their lives made easier or in the first place to conduct themselves and have the powers that reflect due process and the rule of law?

5:05 p.m.

A/Commr Michel Arcand

We apply the law that is offered to us and that we can apply to work towards the achievements we want to achieve.

5:05 p.m.

Conservative

Ed Fast Conservative Abbotsford, BC

My fear was that the effort of the government to try to get the blockades removed in an easier fashion, rather than in a fashion that was appropriate for the circumstances, drove their decision to trigger the Emergencies Act. Yes, you were given additional powers that I believe facilitated your ability to get this done, but your testimony is that there were no efforts made in the lead-up to the triggering of the act that would have applied court orders to perhaps secure the kind of support that police authorities needed.

So you can understand my concern. That's why I asked the question. Was it your concern that your job would be made easier or was it your concern to comply with the rule of law and do it in a way that reflected Canadian standards and Canadian expectations?

5:05 p.m.

A/Commr Michel Arcand

We were offered another tool to apply to facilitate and address the situation. It was the same thing with the Ontario police, who used the Ontario act.

5:05 p.m.

Conservative

Ed Fast Conservative Abbotsford, BC

Yes. Was that tool necessary?

5:05 p.m.

A/Commr Michel Arcand

It was. It shows...the economic measures order was necessary and useful.

5:05 p.m.

Conservative

Ed Fast Conservative Abbotsford, BC

All right.

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

5:05 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Peter Fonseca

Thank you, MP Fast and MP Albas.

We are moving now to the Liberals.

MP Maloney, you're up for five minutes.

5:05 p.m.

Liberal

James Maloney Liberal Etobicoke—Lakeshore, ON

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

To the RCMP and all of the law enforcement community, let me add my thanks to everybody else's. What you did in Ottawa—all of us were there, and we witnessed it—was truly remarkable, and you did it safely.

I'll pick up on something that Mr. Fast was just addressing. My thinking is similar to his, but I come at it from a slightly different perspective. Would you agree with me that the function of the police is to make the community safe, sir?

5:05 p.m.

A/Commr Michel Arcand

It is the primary function.

5:05 p.m.

Liberal

James Maloney Liberal Etobicoke—Lakeshore, ON

Right. Those of us who were in Ottawa witnessed a situation where 4,000 or 5,000 people were scared to leave their homes and couldn't go to work for a period of three weeks. I was less concerned about their ability to stop at Denny's in Kingston and more concerned about the people of Ottawa being able to remove themselves from their homes and go about their business.

You started your evidence today by saying that the Emergencies Act measures were welcome, I believe. Could you explain in further detail what you meant by that, sir?

5:05 p.m.

A/Commr Michel Arcand

Again, it's providing law enforcement other tools to address a situation like this and it permits that.

5:05 p.m.

Liberal

James Maloney Liberal Etobicoke—Lakeshore, ON

You felt that you didn't have those tools at your disposal before the invocation of the Emergencies Act. Is that right?

5:05 p.m.

A/Commr Michel Arcand

Specific to the economic measures order, it was useful.

5:05 p.m.

Liberal

James Maloney Liberal Etobicoke—Lakeshore, ON

Am I correct in saying, then, that part of the reason you felt that way is that, as you said a moment ago, this was an Ottawa police operation, and until the invocation of the emergency measures act you didn't have the ability to work with all of the law enforcement agencies to resolve this situation peacefully? Is that fair?

5:05 p.m.

A/Commr Michel Arcand

It brought the RCMP into the portrait. Yes.

5:10 p.m.

Liberal

James Maloney Liberal Etobicoke—Lakeshore, ON

Okay. Thank you.

I think Mr. Fast also mentioned the fact that nobody had sought a court order prior to the invocation of the act. How long would it take? For each of those 257 accounts that were frozen, if you were to do that by way of court order, each one would require an independent application before the court. Is that correct?

5:10 p.m.

A/Commr Michel Arcand

You are right.

5:10 p.m.

Liberal

James Maloney Liberal Etobicoke—Lakeshore, ON

Each one of those could take days to run its course. Isn't that right?

5:10 p.m.

A/Commr Michel Arcand

Each case is different, but it could take a long time for the investigation to be built and for the proper affidavit to be brought before the court, yes.