Okay. Just to clarify that point in particular, if the RCMP provided information about an individual who is a banked individual at one of your members, the extent to which you followed through on that was basically if that individual did have accounts, those accounts were affected and that individual was affected, right? I'm just trying to understand how much investigation or discussion with the RCMP went on, or was it, “Here's the name. We have the name and we will implement the freezing”?
On March 7th, 2022. See this statement in context.