Fundamentally, it's about going into the inefficiencies of measuring unaffordability. You have to look at that, but if I put on another hat, some of this is really about expanding the idea that we also need to consider housing adequacy.
Some of the leadership that's being done in this field is by the statistics bureau in New Zealand, where they've begun to understand that there is an issue of housing adequacy as opposed to just housing affordability, and that how you deal with the issue of housing adequacy is by looking at the specifics. For instance, what are these units that people are able to purchase as opposed to just a raw unit itself, and what's the format? Are they one, two or three-bedroom units that are ready for families?
Part of this is also looking from the federal government's perspective not only at the funding and the acquisition of housing, but also fundamentally looking at infrastructure, looking at elements such as public transportation as the means of dealing with and controlling living costs. I think that is a way of understanding the full cost of living in the various communities in Canada.