Thank you very much.
You touched on this a bit in your exchange with Ms. May, but I thought it might be helpful for you to come back to the cost of inaction, specifically the financial cost. We often talk as if investing in climate solutions is compared to a status quo that doesn't involve extraordinary costs.
Can you paint a brief picture of what it means to not meet this moment and not spend what we need to spend in order to win? What are the costs that are coming down the line for us? We've seen some already, whether they're measured in the amount of money that had to be spent, in the case of wildfires, or in lost economic opportunity, when the Port of Vancouver was shut down for an extended period of time, for instance.
Could you put a bit more context around that for the committee?