Chair, based on what we've heard from our officials today, they've reiterated basically what we heard the last time, which are two key points, for me, at least.
The first one is that this requirement is redundant, given that OSFI already publishes the report on their website. The report's already public and published.
The second one is that it doesn't appear that it would have a tangible impact in helping workers or any other folks who need to have this information, given that the provincial officials who would receive this report, as proposed, don't have jurisdiction over federally regulated pensions.
Why create a redundant process that doesn't meaningfully impact the people we're trying to help, which are the workers?
I'd be curious to hear the thoughts of other members on this, but that's my perspective on it.