Thank you very much.
This proposal is not something I've studied directly. However, I have to say that it could be part of the mandate of the expert panel on equalization that I hope will be created soon, because we need to look into equalization, as I said, for a number of reasons. I think climate change is a factor when you deal with equalization in relation to natural resources, especially non-renewable resources.
At the same time, this could be quite contentious politically, so I think it might be a good idea to have this discussion done through an arm's-length expert body. Again, the devil is in the details. You can have this broad idea that sounds good on paper, but it's the way it is implemented.
I think we should discuss it, but at the same time we should understand that this is likely to be quite contentious, because such a proposal may advance some provinces over others, and that will probably create more tension over equalization, rather than less.