Is it on this? Time is of the essence.
Evidence of meeting #9 for Finance in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was mclean.
A video is available from Parliament.
Evidence of meeting #9 for Finance in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was mclean.
A video is available from Parliament.
Liberal
Sophie Chatel Liberal Pontiac, QC
At least this version is more in line with the existing language in Bill C-2 and the Income Tax Act that Bill C-2 amends.
NDP
Daniel Blaikie NDP Elmwood—Transcona, MB
I'm happy to vote on the drafter's language in NDP-3, as long as we can have a vote on NDP-4 that will reflect that same language change. That would mean replacing “dividends” in NDP-4 with the term “taxable dividends to an individual who is a holder of common shares of the company or of the subsidiary of the company”.
If we can do that, then it's no problem, because we'll have consistency in the language.
Legislative Clerk
The problem is they won't have time to draft NDP-4 before 10 o'clock. That's pretty much a given at this point.
NDP
Daniel Blaikie NDP Elmwood—Transcona, MB
It's a straight swap of terms, so the term “dividend” in NDP-4 is removed, and it would be replaced by the same terms for everything that's highlighted in NDP-3 as submitted by the drafter this evening.
Liberal
Liberal
Terry Beech Liberal Burnaby North—Seymour, BC
I'm a little confused at this stage as to whether this is an appropriate action, given the discussion tonight, but with regard to my previous comments, particularly around preferred shares and dividends within groups of companies, I just want to ask the officials if those concerns, which were raised by officials earlier in this meeting, are addressed by this redraft that is currently being presented to—
Conservative
Pierre Poilievre Conservative Carleton, ON
They can't answer that. They already said so, and so did you.
Legislative Clerk
Yes, Mr. Chair. I just received it. I just passed it to my colleague, who is going to pass it on to you.
Conservative
Greg McLean Conservative Calgary Centre, AB
I think it was a friendly amendment, and I think Mr. Blaikie accepted the friendly amendment.
Legislative Clerk
There is no such thing as a friendly amendment. Once you move an amendment, it has to be adopted by the whole committee.
Liberal
Conservative
Liberal
Yvan Baker Liberal Etobicoke Centre, ON
Mr. Poilievre, I was speaking to the chair. I need clarification on what we are voting on.
Conservative