I don't think there's a conflict of interest. Again, particularly in this area, the courts have said the tax rules are extremely complicated and precise. The complication and precision are important. Where there's a difference in views, where thinking people disagree on whether taxes are owing, that's where we have the courts to make those decisions.
Ultimately, in terms of what the fair share is, or the correct amount of tax, that's up to Parliament to decide. Anytime Parliament disagrees with a court decision, the proper process is to then amend the rules to however Parliament would like them to be, to ensure the line is drawn clearly. What's inappropriate is to have ambiguous rules and not to have it clear and precise as to what amounts of taxes are owing.