I think that improving the quality of transparency is the basis for our recommendations.
It is up to the Government of Canada to make decisions about the types of budget angles to adopt and how to measure them. At the same time, other stakeholders must make decisions about investments. In our view, that is the advantage of improving the quality of transparency and explaining why a decision was made by the Government of Canada, i.e., changing fiscal angles within an incredibly short period of time.
In addition, it is important to increase credibility, how capital investments are defined and measured. As I explained earlier, we have already had two other examples here in Canada regarding the definitions of “capital”. This is completely new, and it is defined here, only in Ottawa.