When I read through the budget, I found that it was very vague. It was not clear what was included as a capital investment and what was excluded. I think that the government was intentional in the vagueness. As a finance professional, I felt that was surprising because it's such an important term and you would expect it to be clearly laid out.
Would you say that having an independent expert who determines what counts as capital investments will allow parliamentarians to make more informed decisions when it comes to reporting and scrutinizing the government's expenses?