Thank you for the clarification.
One of my colleagues mentioned earlier the lessons that could be learned from what went wrong in projects abroad, whether in England or California. The California example is indeed very interesting.
When it comes to major Canadian infrastructure and transportation projects in Quebec and Ontario in recent years, are you talking to your colleagues at the Réseau express métropolitain, or the REM, or at Metrolinx, for example, to assess what has worked less well, what hasn't worked at all, and what has worked very well?
For example, recently, everyone who lives in the Montreal area knows that there have been a lot of comments about the effects of temperature on the REM. Yes, it's cold. Surprise, surprise.
Are you talking to your colleagues at the REM, then, for example, or other Canadian companies that have recently built major infrastructure projects?