Thank you for bringing some empathy back into this discussion, Mr. Lavoie. I came here to testify tonight and I talked about humility, empathy and authenticity, so I would like to see that in everyone. There is nothing political about what we are doing tonight. I do not understand the line of questioning from the Conservatives. They voted in favour of it, then came to the committee with a view that they were against it. I think it is a bit confusing for people. I hear you. I come from Shawinigan. People back home who are watching this tonight are wondering how you can support something and then be so against it in the comments. You are right to bring it back to the floor. That is a good thing.
We talked a lot about the benefit, but we forgot to talk about all the structural measures. As I said, one-time measures are proposed to help people, but there are also structural measures to make food production more resilient. For example, I know that Mr. Garon will be pleased to hear that, in Quebec, the people I spoke with at the Union des producteurs agricoles gave us ideas, particularly on structural measures. Food security requires producing more at home and having more fluidity in the food production chain, for example. Obviously, we live in a northern country, so we import a lot of fruits and vegetables. We need to increase production in certain sectors, and that is why we focused on that.
Then we said that we had to help people by taking action on competition. I mentioned, for example, the price per unit, which is a Quebec measure. In Quebec, we take it for granted, but it is a measure that does not exist in a structured way in the other Canadian provinces. Consumer protection in Quebec is very advanced.
You are right. As I am trying to explain to our Conservative colleagues this evening, we cannot consider this in isolation, because we also have the Canada child benefit, the Canada school food program, the Canada workers benefit and the Canadian dental care plan, for example. This is a set of measures through which we are supporting Canadians at a time when they need it. I know that even our Conservative colleagues, although they will not tell the committee, understand that our investments are going to grow the Canadian economy. That is why we need a one-time measure and an increase in funding as well, which will allow us to bridge the gap until the Canadian economy gets better.
You are right that people are able to sort things out. I know they are watching television tonight and they are sorting it out. They know what politics is, and they can see when we are genuine and ready to answer questions. Those questions are fair, and we present the facts to people. This evening, I am pleased to be here with you, before the committee, and to see you shed light on this. We need to educate people on these policies. The fact that we voted unanimously on this is a good example of democracy. However, this evening, I think people are a bit confused about some of the positions taken and some of the questions asked.