Okay.
You also mentioned that the vast majority of veterans were well served by the department, but that a small group that didn't feel well served contacted you. This group mainly highlights the issue at hand here, which is the provision's retroactivity.
If I understand correctly, changing the definition of “province” and removing territories from the equation will lead to an increase in fees for veterans.
Does this apply to all veterans, or is this cost increase only significant for veterans living in the territories in question?
