Madam Chair, I don't have a subamendment. I'll say that first.
However, it won't come as a surprise to hear me say that we oppose these two amendments, BQ‑3 and BQ‑4.
Of course, what happened in Mirabel in the 1960s and 1970 is inexcusable and unacceptable, but that is not at all what's happening here.
My colleague, however, gave a more recent example, the REM case in Montreal. No, it did not clog up the courts. The system worked fairly well.
In our view, slowing down the process for a project of this magnitude, which seems to enjoy significant social licence, would be extremely costly.