As I understand it, there may be a consistency issue, but the adoption of G‑3 does not make BQ‑6 out of order. For example, BQ‑6 may add things that would otherwise be missing.
If I understand correctly, G‑3 won't strike the part of the bill that removes the paragraphs about library materials. I know that this kind of verification is usually done at report stage. However, I wonder if it would be best to simply adopt BQ‑6 and then let the government deal with the consistency issue. I know it's done that way sometimes.