I don't know; I'm not convinced. We're being told that amendment G‑3 removes the provisions on library materials from the bill and that preferential rates will be reinstated. However, when it comes to the purpose of the bill, I'm sorry, but I don't agree that it creates an administrative burden; I don't agree with that definition. The purpose of the bill is to ensure that, for certain groups of people, there is still government oversight. Although Canada Post is, in a way, a private corporation, and we want it to be more autonomous, it has a mandate from the government to provide a public service that, from a purely financial point of view, will not necessarily be profitable. I'm not sure that, as elected officials, we want to let Canada Post define that, given that its mandate will eventually be reviewed.
I'm therefore suggesting that we adopt BQ‑6. Then we'll see what the government has to say about consistency. That will be done in the House, and we can do it on a regular basis. I don't think adopting G‑3 invalidates BQ‑6. They both do the same thing. We will work on consistency during votes in the House. I think that would be the right way to do it.