I think there is a way to communicate the gravity of a circumstance with the analysis. In the 1990s, when Canada was coming up toward that fiscal cliff, there were escalating dynamics that saw those debt charges ramping up. One can do the math, put the numbers before parliamentarians and paint the picture of a worsening fiscal situation, particularly if it differs from the way the government is presenting a fiscal situation, that will absolutely be clear and the implications of that situation will be clear.
As I said earlier, I think it's up to parliamentarians to apply the stark language. I would also say that Jason Jacques led the adoption of a communications policy within the PBO, as was recommended by the OECD report that people like to reference, to say that neutrality of language is important for the role.