I think what we need to see, of course, is an alignment. In the housing sector, we often talk about wraparound service support as well. The issue is that we tend to take a very wide approach. We tend to build shelters for women and gender-diverse people escaping violence. We have a specific GBV-serving shelter system that is siloed from the homeless-serving sector system. They're not talking to each other, and we find that a lot of women—we've heard this across the country over and over again—are falling through the cracks.
Our first point of order is always that we need all levels of government, even within the federal government itself—all departments—doing a better job of talking to each other when their services or funding overlap, to make sure as well that we're not misaligned when we are using.... Not to jump around too much, but when we're talking about definitions, I talked about accurate affordability definitions. When we don't have that, we see lower percentages of the housing builds we're doing being deeply affordable. They're not targeting the women in need.
The other thing we're seeing is that, in Build Canada Homes, although we support it, of course, our concern is that when the mention of women and gender-diverse folks comes up, we're talking really about shelter and transitional housing spaces. However, what we're seeing in shelter and transitional housing spaces is a revolving door—