I certainly would agree with that. The more we can emphasize the dual-use principle, particularly when publicly funded research and innovation are taking place, the better for Canadians.
I have a quick question for Mr. Dunn, because I'm short on time.
You named several provinces that have supported, broadly speaking, the notion of inclusion of helium as a critical mineral for the purposes of tax incentives. Does that mean there are provinces that are against it, or simply that those other provinces have been silent on it? For my edification, I'm just trying to understand what the case is against the proposal that you've put forward.