Thank you. I'm at that point now.
Ultimately, what I'm pointing out is that people would have a lot more confidence and trust in the report on CPP—which we believe is necessary—if we could see how Canada's system stacks up against those of other jurisdictions.
With that being said, my subamendment is that the amendment be amended by adding after proposed subsection 43.1(1) the following:
(1.1) The report prepared under subsection (1) and the report prepared under subsection (3) must include a comparison between the Canada Pension Plan and public or mandatory pension systems in other jurisdictions, including the United States, Australia and Sweden, with respect to funding levels, advance funding, reliance on investment income and the long-term financing of promised benefits.