I have missed you all. I wanted to take the time to tell you that first. I'm always happy to take the floor back and see that we can pick up where we left off, once more.
I just have a question for my Conservative colleagues.
You'll be surprised, but this is a real question in this whole debate.
Each of their subamendments seeks to produce a new report, the goal of which is to have concise, simple and digestible information for Canadians. I think I understand that well.
They have been listing the information they want in these reports for 10 hours now. I would like to know how, technically, 10 hours' worth of information can fit into a simple and concise report. I even wonder if the amendments are admissible, because they don't seem to fulfill the goal they were drafted to fulfill.
Canadians are tired of waiting to read the actuarial reports for the Canada pension plan. However, it's a bit too complicated for their subway commute, so we'll make it simpler.
The Conservatives are spending 10 hours to tell us what's needed in the simple report. What's the point of their subamendments?
It's an open-ended question, and I know there are a number of speakers on the list. It might be nice for them to answer a question for which the answer wasn't written in advance. It might liven up their day a bit.