I think it super matters.
I'm new here, but sometimes a fresh perspective is worthwhile. Just because something has been done one way all along, that doesn't mean it always has to be done that way. I would love to see more openness to suggestions for improvement.
As for the subamendment, I'm merely arriving now. I want to voice my strong concurrence on the subamendment. I can see that a lot of work went into its preparation. This level of nuance is extremely commendable. I'm very proud of the team that put it together. I think they were up all night.
It's a shame that something as important as an economic update implementation measure has to be as rushed as it is. That might be coming with this fresh perspective. It seems like something that could have taken a lot more time or could have had a lot more time budgeted for it than it had.
It's always a good time to voice my surprise at how silly some of the stuff that happens here is. We probably would have had an agreement from both sides on that particular statement at this particular time.
It's nice to see Mr. Sawatzky chuckling. I haven't seen him in a while—not since yesterday.
To familiarize everyone with the text of the subamendment, it says, “The report prepared under subsection (1)”—