Here's my concern, though: In a multimedia world and in a place in which there is so much coming at Canadians, especially the struggles that Canadians face every day, I suspect that very few—and by very few, I probably mean less than 1% of 1%—ever go to your website to review that.
I think part of the reason is.... I enjoy the actuarial language. I'm a tax lawyer by trade, so I could talk to you all day. This is my excitement, but for most normal human beings and most well-adjusted people, the idea of going to your website and looking at an actuarial report, I think, has limited appeal.
What this amendment gets at is that, in today's world, government doesn't just have an obligation to vomit out information and numbers, but it also has an obligation to make it understandable and a little bit interesting, if not compelling, to individuals. I don't think that the publication of the information is enough in 2026. I think we need to, as much as possible, make it easy enough for people to understand, and when they're going from working all day to making dinner and taking their kids to dance or to hockey, they're still compelled to look at this.
My colleague's amendment is talking about, in plain language, whether the CPP is sustainable.
Do you understand, and do you think the chief actuary could perhaps do a little better in the job of making the information not only digestible but also interesting, as much as possible?