I appreciate that, Mr. Lawrence.
This amendment that's proposed is vague. It can't be implemented as drafted, unfortunately. It's also unclear what is meant by “complaints”, which is generally given a broad interpretation. In terms of the phrase liability “could be invoked”, an organization will or will not have liability. It doesn't really invoke liability, so that's problematic. Lastly, the vagueness puts the minister at risk of not fulfilling his or her legislative duties.
For these three reasons, we would oppose this amendment.
