We're talking about specifics, so I'll read the words of the subamendment that relate to the argument I'm making. It is with respect to funding levels, advanced funding, reliance on investment income and the long-term financing of promised benefits.
That's of the three countries, right? It's the United States, Australia.... I'm just reading the last portion of that subamendment. I can read the whole subamendment if you want me to, but I'll read the second half, starting at this, “between the Canada Pension Plan and public or mandatory pension systems in other jurisdictions, including the United States, Australia and Sweden, with respect to funding levels, advance—