I appreciate the point you're making. The amendment and the subamendment relate to a ministerial report. Neither the amendment nor the subamendment, if I am correct.... It isn't the actuarial report. I wouldn't expect it to say, “Please refer to page 462 of the actuarial report.”
I think the conversation we're having right now helps buttress the reason we're proposing these amendments and subamendments. The question I'm asking isn't about the report. It's about how a person with knowledge of how the CPP works can translate nominal numbers into inflation-adjusted numbers. It is a question independent of the actuarial report. I've asked you the question twice.
Maybe the chair can help.
Is there a different official present who could answer this question?