Thank you for the question.
Again, I haven't seen the legislation, but we would be in support of what you described.
Again, we're supportive of the outcomes that are required with respect to defence procurement. The defence procurement industry is very much looking towards, as I said in my opening remarks, an efficient, effective and timely investment into the industry and building up the industry across the board, so we're very supportive of any mechanism that does that.
When I say “effective”, that's where we can unpack some of the items that we are looking towards. Again, it's that predictable, long-term demand signal for industry that's required. My hope and expectation is that the new legislation will enable that organization to have clear transparency around the rules of procurement that are there, which need to continue, and then again, continual engagement with industry so that industry is brought into the discussion earlier versus being left at the back end of the procurement process, which then involves some of the issues that I talked about before.
Again, I'm more focused on the outcome of this versus the specific nuances and how we get there. As long as we get to that outcome, we're supportive.
