Thank you, Mr. Stoffer. That is a very good suggestion. We can certainly let the committee know, or have a report that I can make available to the committee members, about what is happening, where we see a decrease, or an increase, or whatever.
The thing is that part of the problem in Newfoundland is that we have some people who are completely and utterly irresponsible, one of them being a former minister and now a senator who continuously talks about the hundred Russian trawlers that are out off our coast and that type of thing. We see very little activity. If we could control the fishery inside our 200-mile limit today as well as we can control it on the Nose and Tail and Flemish Cap, we'd be in very good shape.
Things have come a long way. We see the cooperation we're getting, even from countries like Spain, now before the requirements kick in, but as of January 1, any countries that step out of line in relation to illegal, unregulated fishing, overfishing, or misreporting are going to pay an extremely heavy price. Added to that of course is the resolution at the UN. I believe we have gone a long way toward solving that problem.
However, we have to make sure that we are the ones who will continue to manage that by the presence of our coast guard. That's why, when we talk about losing jobs and so on, our aim is to enhance the coast guard to the point where we'll be adding rather than taking away. Our presence in the north will depend heavily on the coast guard, so I see an enhanced role for the coast guard rather than a diminished one.
If we talk about custodial management, a term that nobody has ever defined, we have a scenario now where we have the management regime outside basically the same as we have inside, and we can manage that with our forces if we keep them in place--our coast guard and our aerial surveillance. Basically, we have the tools now and we've made the progress to do the job, and it would be only fair to let people know how far we've come.