I guess there's one aspect overall.
We're aware that the Faroese have been fishing in 3L shrimp in an amount that, as you've said, while it has been reduced, is still not down to a level that's within the quota based on scientific advice.
So we have to stress, number one, the importance of adherence—that's one aspect—by getting an objection mechanism in place so they do not have the sole power to unilaterally set that quota. They have to justify that in front of an independent party and put forward their case. If there's legitimacy to their case—that they got an unfair share in the beginning, that it should have been a higher amount, that we were conducting fishing in that area back in the nineties, whether it was experimental or what it was—and there are certain arguments, their issues must be resolved within the NAFO realm, not bilaterally. They wouldn't be resolved bilaterally. They're issues for NAFO to deal with and they're issues that our country, as a contracting party to that, would be pushing for a resolution of that issue—