When the issue started, I think there was one licence, and then there was an additional licence given to them, or they bought it along the way.
I guess the point is that the court did not say whether the two licences held by the band were sufficient to recognize the section 35 right. The court also made another very important declaration in that it recognized that others had rights to the fishery as well. There had to be some balance struck. It suggested that the matter go back to court to decide what that balance should be, and DFO took it upon themselves not to go back.