Evidence of meeting #1 for Fisheries and Oceans in the 39th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was chair.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Clerk of the Committee  Mr. Stephen Knowles
Erica Pereira  Procedural Clerk
François Côté  Committee Researcher

3:50 p.m.

NDP

Peter Stoffer NDP Sackville—Eastern Shore, NS

Exactly, because my problem with this, and I don't blame the individuals who are before us, is we know how the previous government had done it, and we know that the current government has done this in other committees as well. We got the playbook last April from the whip of the Conservative Party on how to disrupt, and nothing is stopping the Conservative side from not showing up at all, period. And if they don't show up and you have the opposition here, the witnesses go home. So I think three members, regardless of the party makeup, is fair enough, because the government.... I'm not saying these people would do it, but they could be ordered to do so, and if they're ordered to do so, then we're here and the witnesses who have travelled all this distance. So I think we should keep it exactly the way it is.

3:50 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Fabian Manning

Mr. MacAulay.

3:50 p.m.

Liberal

Lawrence MacAulay Liberal Cardigan, PE

I'm certainly not saying that the people here would, but if the government decided, whatever government it might be, that they don't want to hear a certain group of people, all they have to do is not come and that freezes the committee. They cannot operate if this passes.

3:50 p.m.

Liberal

Bill Matthews Liberal Random—Burin—St. George's, NL

And the opposition can do the same thing.

3:50 p.m.

Liberal

Lawrence MacAulay Liberal Cardigan, PE

Yes.

So if it's not in there at all, if you have enough people here for a quorum without stating that certain parties have to be here, then the committee can operate. If you pass this it means that one group can stop the committee.

If that's what the group wants, then okay, but I disagree with it.

3:50 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Fabian Manning

Mr. Blais.

November 14th, 2007 / 3:50 p.m.

Bloc

Raynald Blais Bloc Gaspésie—Îles-de-la-Madeleine, QC

I am going to call upon the logic that has always prevailed in this committee's work. Our previous procedure never caused any problems with respect to a reduced quorum. Its only purpose was to allow witnesses to be heard. So in my opinion, the proposed amendment is unacceptable. I would therefore invite colleagues to vote against the proposed amendment.

3:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Fabian Manning

Are there any other comments?

3:55 p.m.

Conservative

Blaine Calkins Conservative Wetaskiwin, AB

On a point of order, Mr. Chair, are we still discussing the amendment that was proposed by Mr. Allen?

3:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Fabian Manning

We're still discussing the amendment, yes.

Are there any other comments?

Go ahead, Mr. Kamp.

3:55 p.m.

Conservative

Randy Kamp Conservative Pitt Meadows—Maple Ridge—Mission, BC

I understand the comments that have been made, and it seems to me if we don't want to specify a member of the government being there then we should not specify a member of the opposition being there. We should just say three members.

3:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Fabian Manning

Any comment?

Okay. We'll deal with the amendment put forward by Mr. Allen first.

(Amendment negatived)

3:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Fabian Manning

Is there further discussion?

3:55 p.m.

Conservative

Blaine Calkins Conservative Wetaskiwin, AB

I'd like to propose an amendment where we remove the last part of the motion that says “including one member of the opposition, where three members are present”.

3:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Fabian Manning

Is there discussion?

3:55 p.m.

NDP

Peter Stoffer NDP Sackville—Eastern Shore, NS

That's fair.

3:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Fabian Manning

Any discussion?

Okay, the motion would read that the chair be authorized to hold meetings to receive evidence and to have that evidence printed when a quorum is not present, provided that at least three members are present.

3:55 p.m.

Some hon. members

Good.

3:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Fabian Manning

(Motion agreed to)

3:55 p.m.

Conservative

Ken Epp Conservative Edmonton—Sherwood Park, AB

And that's on the amendment, right?

3:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Fabian Manning

Now we have to vote on the main motion.

(Motion agreed to)

3:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Fabian Manning

Moving along to the motion on the distribution of documents, it reads: that only the clerk of the committee be authorized to distribute documents to members of the committee, and only when such documents exist in both official languages.

3:55 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

3:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Fabian Manning

You have to be patient with me, as I'm new here.

3:55 p.m.

Liberal

Gerry Byrne Liberal Humber—St. Barbe—Baie Verte, NL

Control yourself.