I think I have your question correct. The question you're asking is whether or not these amendments, these changes, are in any way leading towards a greater level of opportunity for Canada to extend jurisdiction. Really, they're not. They're moving in the opposite direction.
What's happening in terms of constitutional reform and within NAFO is an attempt to fix NAFO and address some of its shortcomings. Of course, as the minister expressed, there are a lot of reservations about whether or not that will be done. Canada's approach has been to work with the other NAFO members and try to effect reforms that will provide for an effective regime. As we all know, NAFO has never been an effective regime for management outside the 200-mile limit. There's a lot of apprehension about whether or not that's going to work. It's by no means, under any shape or form, a substitution for an extension of jurisdiction and adoption of custodial management.