Again, it goes back to the coastal state whose stocks are off, in our case, a 200-mile limit. These stocks do straddle back and forth over the bank. Unfortunately, when we carved out the 200-mile limit, we did not close the door, and that's the nose and tail of the bank and the Flemish Cap. So what we're saying is that we need to be able to manage our stocks and have control of that management so that we can make sure that the conservation practices are in there, that there is sustainability. And in no way, shape, or form are we saying that we're not going to share that stock with those who have fished it historically.
With our northern cod stock, I think we basically have 95% of the quota. So in actual fact it's pretty much our stock, right? With regard to yellowtail and American plaice, again, it's in the high nineties. Why in heaven's name do we have to depend on NAFO to come in and manage stocks that we just about have total control over? And why do we have to sit around a table, then, with 12 others and have one vote and hope they don't eat into our quotas or prevent us from doing the conservation?
So custodial management is protection of our stocks and our having the control to manage it, to maintain it, to make sure it's there forever and a day.