I'd just like to make one comment if I could, Morris.
The one thing we saw with the whole fisheries renewal initiative and other programs of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans outside of small craft harbours is that there's a lot of consultation done with fishermen's organizations, and those people--in fisheries and aquaculture management's eyes--were the ones to consult. But in many cases they forget about the harbour authorities and the potential impacts it will have. Whether you're talking about vessels that are going in Newfoundland from 64-11 up to 89-11, it's going to have an impact--larger boats, much larger; fewer boats in some cases. In some cases we've seen increases because of changes in fisheries policy.
The one thing we've been raising nationally is the need to consult with groups such as ours, from a harbour authority perspective, because we're the last ones they think about in terms of a potential impact. At the same time, people like to talk revenue generation, and we have policies that are changing, but we're not being consulted. Let's face it, they have to leave from a harbour and come back to a harbour, so it does have an impact, the policy and changes that are happening. In the west coast we've seen there have been buybacks or purchases of licences, access to licences, but no vessels, and some of the harbour authorities are left to deal with vessels that become abandoned or derelict.
So there are a number of issues there where some consultation in the initial stages would have been, I'm sure, very useful.