I'll give you an example of a couple of issues that we're really concerned about in Ontario. They intersect with the exotic species and endangered species. It's all a great big ball of string.
We've had serious problems with the enforcement of habitat regulations and environmental assessments regarding the hydroelectric developments and, more recently, regarding proposals for what I would characterize as intensive industrial-scale wind farms offshore. If all these proposals had been approved, we would have had hundreds of wind turbines erected in the Western Basin of Lake Erie, which is the nursery for the most significant fishery in the province.
Under the provincial legislation, it appeared that the onus was on us to prove that there was a problem. The one hammer we had was enormously effective, from both a public relations and a political perspective. This was the fish habitat regs, and we wielded that hammer with enthusiasm. In the end, with the exception of a very small number of turbines around Kingston, this was put on the back burner. But we have concerns. We don't know what the changes are going to look like, ultimately, and in a situation like that we are worried. We don't like it.
The hydroelectric agenda in Ontario is quite aggressive. My family is an Ontario Hydro family, I am a Hydro brat, and it pains me to say this, but OPG, the successor to Ontario Hydro, Ontario Power Generation, is not an environmentally friendly organization. I don't care how they spin it, I don't care how they draw it, turbines kill fish, dams block passage, impoundment is bad for the landscape. The idea that this is green energy is a laugh. Nonetheless, they are very large, very powerful, and very difficult to fight. We would be loath to lose what hammers we have for dealing with those folks in those kinds of settings. So, yes, we're watching it very closely.