I'll be sharing my time with Mr. Toone, and I just have a very brief question.
I have a very quick comment first. The UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples has a clause that talks about free, prior, and informed consent. What we've watched the government do consistently is move to calling something engagement, not consultation, because I think it's fairly clear that, from the Supreme Court decisions, they're not meeting their commitments under the Supreme Court decisions about what constitutes consultation.
Mr. Wuttke, I thank you for laying out more clearly what, in your view, would constitute consultation. I think we would all agree that hasn't happened either on this particular piece of legislation or on Bill C-38, or on the changes to the fishing regulations.
Have you had an opportunity to examine whether the parallel harvesting agreements on land claims—Tsawwassen is one of them, where the harvesting agreement wasn't incorporated into the land claims agreement, it was a parallel agreement—would be included in this definition?