As I said, you can't underestimate the value of the traditional fisheries, and I'd put marine mammals into that. It's huge, as a food cost to a community.
The commercial fisheries related to shrimp and Greenland halibut or turbot are prosecuted by a few people for the larger community, and through the arrangements in the land claim and with the community associations, they all benefit from it. But it's a few people prosecuting it for the benefit of the greater good. You can answer that question either way and come down with an answer.
I don't think there is a right or a wrong to it. It depends upon what your perspective is. If you're a young family trying to feed your kids and you look at what it costs to bring in milk and fruit and vegetables and that kind of stuff, you're going to be thinking that the traditional marine mammal harvest, as well as char and those kinds of fisheries, is fundamentally important to you. As dollars and cents in the economy of the north, it's going to be looked at from the commercial value of turbot and shrimp.