We would, I think, support the motion as it was currently read.
One definition of closed containment is any system of fish production that creates a controlled interface between the fish and the natural environment. It's defined in various ways. As we've seen in the study, there are different views on just how controlled, whether it's on land or in water, or whether it's recirculating with fresh water or salt water.
To Ryan's earlier point, the committee did go to this one outside Campbell River to look at it before it was actually in production. It would probably be instructive to see it in production, if we could justify that travel, and maybe see something else out there.
Closed containment is a concept rather than a geographically specific thing, so I think to put in closed containment in the Pacific region or anywhere doesn't make a lot of sense. I think we should just leave it broad like that. As Mike said, and as Kristen said in one of the points, if the Cohen commission, for example, finds there is a need for a more controlled interface between the wild and the farmed fish, then it would be good for us to be able to know if the technology is there and so on. I think we would have made a good contribution to that whole discussion that's taking place in British Columbia at the moment.