The projections made on growth, first of all, sound like a lot. In fact, the kind of growth we're talking about is measured growth and it's partly because of marketing. It would be unwise to grow in a huge way and try to dump a lot of product on the market. It's important that if we begin to grow again in Canada we do it in a staged and measured approach. At the same time, we based some of the jobs on the multiplier effect of having spinoff benefits for suppliers. It's based on some of the work that, I think it was Gardner Pinfold, did for DFO a few years ago. They came up with the multiplier effect that if you have one farming job this is two and a half times other jobs. We basically based our projections on some of that early work that Gardner Pinfold did. Again, I think it's important to stress that we are looking for growth in this industry because, except for Newfoundland, we have...and even with that growth in Newfoundland you still take the national average and we've been flatlined for 13 years. That's really where the 40% drop in market share comes from because all of the other countries are growing at a 6% to 7% annual increase. The graph goes like that and we're flatlined. The difference is that 40%. We did grow rapidly in the 1980s and early 1990s and since then there has been nothing. That's really where the discrepancy comes, where the other countries are continuing to grow, despite their own challenges. It's despite challenges, despite continual issues that we work on, but they're still able to see growth and we haven't.
Does that help answer? Was there something else at the end that you wanted?