Just to stay within the context of the small craft harbours program, I think when you look at where it puts its feet on the ground, so to speak, it acknowledges the difference in the three oceans. Certainly a key element in prioritizing where investments are made through the program is through the productivity of the fisheries themselves. The infrastructure is tied to support the prosecution primarily of the commercial fishery.
As you've just pointed out, because it operates differently in all three oceans, priorities are set a little differently. The configuration of the program is different. It's tailored to meet local circumstances as opposed to a single national template that applies uniformly across the country.