I think there's cause for conservation concern in area 5, and that's reflected in DFO's decision this year to decrease the TAC—the total allowable catch—by 10%. I can't remember exactly what the decrease was in the fishable biomass estimate or the spawning stock biomass estimate, but I think it was in the order of 30-plus%, but I would have to check the exact numbers.
So there is cause for concern in SFA 5 this year, and we hadn't judged there to be any cause for conservation concern in area 5 previously.