Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I have a couple of questions, and I'll turn it over to Mr. Sopuck. I know he salivates when there's a scientist in the room.
We've heard a number of times, both today and other days, about the disproportionate nature of the cuts on the way down. Of course, we haven't heard too much about the disproportionate nature of the increases on the way up. In fact, I think they were, by policy, intended to mirror each other.
Can you tell me the rationale? Was it the principle of adjacency that determined that 90%, or close to that, of the increase on the way up should go to the inshore fleet, and only 10% to the offshore fleet? What was the discussion at the time to come up with this? Was it a principled decision, is my question?