Just to elaborate on that a little bit more, the example that was provided is one particular example. Bluefin tuna would be another. I would highlight, in relation to the issue brought up earlier, that currently the bill is limited in the sense that our current regulatory-making powers only relate to organizations or treaties to which Canada is party.
Canada is party to the organization that manages Patagonian toothfish, as it is for bluefin tuna, but we would not be able to develop import requirements regarding documentation for organizations or treaties to which we are not party. There is a bit of a distinction there, a technical distinction.
Right now, however, they are referred to as catch documentation schemes or statistical documentation programs in a number of regional fisheries management organizations to which Canada is party. In those instances we would be able to establish some requirements with regard to those imports.
