Given the importance of this bill, would it be possible to set it aside and bring in people who can assure of us that? As soon as we set a maximum, actually…In this case, one thing is really piling on top of another. You might well say that it really is not related and there is no certainty about it.
Once the wording of a bill is set, it is set. When it is voted on, it is voted on. It would be more certain if someone were to come and explain this to us and to tell us that we really are protected. The amendment could have referred back to the other provision and specified that it does not prevent clause 18.04 from being enforced, but that is not the case and it looks like some protection is missing.