You're absolutely correct.
You mentioned, of course, the problem with Greenland and Saint-Pierre and Miquelon. Unfortunately, for governments in this country, fish have not always been the top priority, in my opinion. They're still not, and we need to make them more of a priority. What do governments need to do to convince countries like Greenland...?
I can understand in a way, though. What they're doing is inappropriate, in my opinion.
When we look at the bluefin tuna being netted, it's a migratory source itself—I'm sure you're aware of that. If we conserve, and we fish with rod and reel, and take no more than one-and-a-half per boat, and do everything right, and then they gather up a whole bunch in nets somewhere else, where the stock passes, it eliminates the purpose of what we're doing here. I can see the same thing that Mr. Cleary was speaking to on this issue.
It's desperately unfortunate. It's annoying for the Prince Edward Island tuna fishermen to have to fish fewer tuna. I think it's pretty annoying for people to have to take fewer salmon because countries like Greenland and Saint-Pierre and Miquelon have decided they're going to take basically what they wish. In fact, we're not sure what they take at all. Is it 58 tonnes? Perhaps they're taking 70 tonnes. It likely is, probably.