Let's turn to fisheries protection in the province of B.C.
There was certainly a desire to provide enhanced compliance and protection tools, provide greater clarity, certainty, and consistency of regulatory requirements through the expanded use of standards, regulations, and time limits. This has come up before, but can you respond to the changes in the definition of “permanent alteration”, how we may have actually stepped forward in enhancing our protection? I'd also like someone to comment about the definition of “serious harm” and “death of a fish”, whichever one of you who would like to deal with those things.